|Hair Color||Dishevelled waves|
|Seeking||I Am Ready For Fuck Meet|
|Relation Type||Looking For A Hot Fucking|
Xep last message correction
Revision History 1. This specification allows the sending client to flag the second message as correcting the first.
Example 1. It is suggested that a client should always allow sending corrections, but may make the user aware of the potential for duplicate messages to be interpreted by the recipients. In restricted environments, implementors could choose iis allow or disallow sending in such cases, as is appropriate for the intended deployments. The receiving client then treats the newly received paylo as completely replacing all paylo of the original message.
A receiving client can choose to replace the message in whatever display is used for messages, or in any stored history, or can choose to display the correction in another way. Clients MUST send ids on messages if they allow the user to correct cgat. To deal with multiple paylo, the sender MUST re-send the entire stanza, only altering id and the paylo being corrected and adding the 'replace' payload.
It is expected that the receiver SHOULD then treat the new stanza as complete replacement for all the paylo received in chaat original stanza. A single message may be corrected multiple times by subsequent edits.
Produce broadcasts from anywhere
A correction MUST only be allowed when both the original message and correction originate from the same sender caht 6 ]. While it's not possible to prevent this protocol from being used in such a way, it is not intended that it provides a way to iks expanding a message indefinitely and clients, in as much as it is sensible, should present use of this extension only for correction rather than for providing a continuous stream, for which In-Band Real Time Text XEP [ 7 ] can be used instead.
If the same message is to be corrected several times, the id of the original message is used in each case e. If a message of id 1 is corrected by a message of id 2, a subsequent correction should correct 1, not 2. Correction MUST only be used to change chatt logical content details of a stanza e. Where a correction stanza includes metadata, for example stanza or MAM ids, these are properties of the correction stanza, and do not correct aspects of the original stanza.
While it is possible to use this protocol to correct messages older than the most recent received from a full JID, such use is out of scope for this document and support for this SHOULD NOT be assumed without further negotiation.
I searching horney cock
It is also suggested that clients make the original message available in some way, although this UI consideration is out of the scope of this document. There exist some payload types where correction is problematic, for some deployments.
In particular, care needs to be taken that security labels from Security Labels in XMPP XEP [ 8 ] are handled in an appropriate manner for the security domains of a given deployment.